Saturday, 17 February 2018

Government Mass Murderer—The Flawed Gun Control Argument of the Leftist Faction

Gun Control Works

 

Having a gun pointed at you is terrifying.

 

Facing death at the barrel of a gun is chilling.

 

To die prematurely because of a bullet, when you still had so much life left to live, is a repulsive and hideous event.

 

Being unarmed, while another points a gun at you, knowing there is little to nothing you can do to save your life, or the lives of those you love, is a powerless feeling that no one should experience.

 

It is a terrifying thing to be held at gun point or shot.

 

No matter if it’s a solitary active shooter, or a hunter-killer squad assigned by our government.

 

As the death toll in Florida hits us directly in our faces, and tears our hearts apart, the argument of gun control has, once again, taking a prominent position in our conversation and politics.

 

The arguments haven’t changed since the last major shooting.

 

Many are calling for change.

 

They are demanding our government do something.

 

My question is: Do what?

 

Take away the rights of US Citizens?

 

Recent history shows us what happens when government becomes involved in such evil.

 

Beyond the initial bill and implementation, who decides the limits of gun restriction, or worse yet, repossession?

 

What is to prevent the government from judging that assault weapons are not the only aim and make a judgment against certain handguns?

 

What’s next, after that?

 

Gun control works.

 

But not to keep citizens safer.

 

Gun control works by making the government stronger and the people weaker.

 

Throughout history, this fact has been proven.

Violent Hate

 

The 9/11 mass murder of three-thousand people used planes not bullets.

 

A car was used to plow into crowds in Charlottesville, VA. and New York, last year.

 

Recently, vehicles were used to murder many in Nice, Berlin, London, Stockholm, and Barcelona.

 

The common denominator is hate, not what kind of weapon is used.

 

When the stimulus is hate, the brain will create a weapon out of anything.

 

In prison, shanks and shivs are rampant.  This in a relentlessly controlled environment.

 

If some deranged murderer wants to slaughter innocent people, he/she will find a way to do it.

 

Unless they are stopped first.

Government Mass Murderers

 

Throughout human history, individual mass murderers have existed.

 

Government mass murderers should terrify far more than private mass murderers.

 

Many of their names are well known.

 

A leftist argues to take away weapons from the Citizens because the acts of a few.

 

Mao Zedong, Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler—they were all leftists who believed in gun-control, and when they achieved it, they murdered countless millions of unarmed Citizens.

 

I do not wish to trade one serial killer for a far worse one.

 

The government is a far worse mass murderer than Nicolas de Jesus Cruz could ever dream of being.

 

The government desires people control.

 

Their favorite way to achieve this is by playing upon our emotions and manipulating them through false pretenses.

 

My inclination is always to love my Country—the Republic of the United States of America—and protect it from a government I distrust, even, at times, hate.

It’s Personal

 

My little sister was shot by a handgun.

 

My great Uncle Robert was gunned down, murdered by a gun wielding mob.

 

I speak from personal pain and experience.

 

Gun control is not the solution we seek.

Desensitization and Cultural Numbness

 

The FBI failed to follow up on an obvious “in your face” lead.

 

The recent FBI debacles are a disgrace to its history, and ours.

 

Regardless of where anyone sits on the FBI’s “insurance policy” “secret societies” criminal plot, following up on such a clear lead could have prevented the gruesome event at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

 

The FBI failed us.

 

And the cost was high.

 

And what about us as a society?

 

The Chicago killings continue despite the existence of severe gun control.

 

The Bataclan Concert Hall bloodbath in Paris is another testament that severe gun control laws do not keep people safer.

 

And what about the leftist defending the law-breaking actions of the illegal aliens who illegally cross our sovereign borders every day?

 

Or the pile of non-viable lumps of cells flushed down the toilet of abortion clinics throughout our country.

 

Does this not lead to a further disrespect of our laws in the minds of the mentally disturbed and criminally minded?

 

Does this not lead to desensitization and cultural numbness, and further increase the chances of a “walking time bomb” going off, and a bigger bang occurring?

 

You Are

 

Remember, this is how the leftist faction starts.

 

They don’t solve the problem, they start with half-backed theories and flawed premises, slanted to fit their narrative and anti-USA agenda.

 

They create issue after issue with their perverted agenda, then punish law-abiding Citizens by taking away their way of life and infringing on their rights.

 

They tell us it’s for our own good.

 

The Nazis pushed for Euthanasia of the old, and those in society they judged as unproductive or useless.

 

All using the method of emotional rectitude

 

Who decides what is an appropriate weapon for US Citizens?

 

The Founders have already created a document that protects against government oppression and tyranny.

 

The Second Amendment isn’t about “hunting rifles” and sport shooting, etc.

 

It’s about “arming the Citizenry” and organizing and preparing our People with the means and skills to defend themselves against our government.

 

Can anyone guarantee protection against our government?

 

The chairperson of the DNC readily admitted that the DNC “rigged” an election for Hillary Clinton.

 

The FBI calls itself an “insurance policy” against a presidential candidate getting elected.

 

History is full of governments controlling and murdering people to maintain power over them.

 

It is human control, not gun control, that is the ultimate objective here.

 

Ruby Ridge, Waco, attest to what the government is capable of.

 

Regardless of the situation—we do not want the government to possess all of the weapons.

 

We do not want the Citizenry unarmed.

 

After 9/11, the argument was largely united, and, at times, absent of partisan politics.

 

Because of the method of destruction, as well as the weapon.

 

Nonetheless, rather than face the issue and work toward a solution, the leftists always attack the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.

 

Recently, Johnny Galecki of TBBT provided opinion on the gun control argument and said that “Change is needed.”

 

“In my last couple of posts, I’ve not suggested a single idea for new gun laws or background checks or even mental illness issues after the latest school murders in Florida. I only suggested change. And yet many folks were outraged and threatened and angered by only that,” the actor wrote.

 

Here is my response to him, and many of the other leftists who always go down the path of gun control as a viable solution.

 

It all depends on what change you wish to bring, and on who you target for change.

 

Your target should be against the murderers and criminals who perpetrate these hideous crimes.

 

If you’re another lunatic leftist who blames the NRA and its members, do your research.

 

The NRA and its members have not committed these shootings.

 

The Constitution was written 250 years ago by People who possessed enough intelligence to write words that formed our country and to live long after they died.

 

If you are looking to change those words—you best ready yourself for a war.

 

And it won’t be a nineteen-year-old, leftist freak punk you’ll be fighting against.

 

It’ll be against men and women who still believe in the Constitution’s sacred words.

 

And Patriots who believe that the Constitution is not the root of the problem.

 

You are.

 

Publius

 

 

Images courtesy of Sebastián León Prado, John Bakator, and Nikita Kachanovsky

https://nypost.com/2017/08/12/vehicle-plows-into-counter-protesters-at-white-power-rally-in-virginia/

 

http://www.newsweek.com/stockholm-vehicle-attacks-europe-580596

 

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/johnny-galecki-says-people-were-outraged-response-florida-224919846.html

 

 

http://baltazarbolado.com

 

On twitter: https://twitter.com/baltazar_bolado

 

Author of: http://baltazarbolado.com/book/publius-liberatas-aut-mors/

http://baltazarbolado.com/book/paint-black/

 

The article Government Mass Murderer—The Flawed Gun Control Argument of the Leftist Faction is courtesy of baltazarbolado

Source: http://www.baltazarbolado.com/government-mass-murderer-the-flawed-gun-control-argument-of-the-leftist-faction/



source https://baltazarbolado1.wordpress.com/2018/02/17/government-mass-murderer-the-flawed-gun-control-argument-of-the-leftist-faction/

Saturday, 10 February 2018

Presumptuous—A Response to Gus Kenworthy’s Public Outburst Against Our President

In recent exchanges over the internet, skier Gus Kenworthy has been extremely vocal on his critique of our President and Vice-president.

 

Here is my response.

 

I think it is incredibly presumptuous and self-inflated to believe that anyone gives a damn about your sexuality and orientation in the grand scheme of things.

 

I certainly don’t.

 

What I take issue with is how many in the LGBTQ society—including you—think otherwise and flash their private areas with such abandonment.

 

I’m heterosexual—I’m comfortable with my status.  I don’t feel the need to shove my sexuality into people’s faces like a badly prepared omelet, or a diffident, immature pubescent.

 

Every damn time I see the disgusting, over promoted, overproduced gay parades, I am sickened by the lack of restraint or common decency exhibited by your society.

 

We’re all different.  Thank God for that.

 

That doesn’t mean we need to flaunt our differences at every damn turn.

 

Overall, I—and most people, I bet—judge a person less on their sexual preferences, and more on the overall respect and treatment they provide others.

 

Speaking of which, the manner you have addressed our President, and our Vice-president, in recent days is far from the same respect you and the LGBTQ society demand for yourselves.  You have not only voiced your personal grievances against our President and Vice-president on a public forum, without providing them the common respect to address them directly, but you’ve done so at a global event—the Olympics.

 

Is this respectful to you?  Do you believe the Olympics is the best venue to denounce our President and proclaim your intention to bypass a White House ceremony after the games?

 

Does this not remind you of the behaviors you speak out against, that are allegedly perpetrated against LGBTQ persons?

 

Ultimately, because of your lack of respect for our President—and for the millions of US Voters who elected him into office—your behavior, not your sexual orientation or preferences, have defined you as a person, in my eyes.

 

It appears you have one slanted view of the entire world—you, and the rest of civilization.  And only your feelings, preferences, and way of life are relevant.  The rest of us must be careful with how we say anything, or we will be mercilessly classified, marginalize, even dehumanized, by being referred to as bigoted, or prejudice and intolerant.

 

It’s an old, sad mantra that I have heard spread by many, including members within your society.

 

You see, in the end, it’s not who we sleep with that offers civilization its best vision of who we are as a person.  Rather, it is what we say and do that exposes our soul and expresses and reveals our persona.

 

I am a believer of Liberty.

 

This means I don’t want anyone to interfere with me on how I live, nor how I express my existence.

 

For this reason—if no other—I do not want your freedom to be infringed upon.

 

You are not like me, or President Trump.

 

And we are not like you.

 

Why can’t we leave it at that, and then work to find common ground in a mature, respectful manner?

 

By ignoring each other, we display to the world the worst part of our humanity, as well as losing the opportunity to perhaps work through our differences and provide a better way for our posterity.

 

I wish you well in the Olympics.  I don’t know you, or care about who you choose to sleep with, but you represent our Country in one of the largest sports settings in the world.  For that reason—and that reason alone—I hope you win as many medals as humanly possible.

 

I hope this is your main ambition at the Olympic games.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/team-usa-apos-openly-gay-181740278.html

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/373201-gay-us-olympians-continue-feud-with-vice-president-eat-your-heart

 

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/olympics-skier-gus-kenworthy-cheeky-151845090.html#comments

 

 

http://baltazarbolado.com

 

On twitter: https://twitter.com/baltazar_bolado

 

Author of: http://baltazarbolado.com/book/publius-liberatas-aut-mors/

http://baltazarbolado.com/book/paint-black/

The following blog post Presumptuous—A Response to Gus Kenworthy’s Public Outburst Against Our President is republished from http://www.baltazarbolado.com/

Source: http://www.baltazarbolado.com/presumptuous-a-response-to-gus-kenworthys-public-outburst-against-our-president/



source https://baltazarbolado1.wordpress.com/2018/02/11/presumptuous-a-response-to-gus-kenworthys-public-outburst-against-our-president/

Saturday, 3 February 2018

Yellow Journalism—Yahoo’s Rapid Decline and Their Gutter Legacy

In 2007, the previous president made extensive use of yahoo’s cyber influence, contracting paid trolls to post bogus comments on its site, as well as colluding with the news conglomerate in falsifying and manipulating news cycles to fit the campaign message and promote the leftist agenda.

 

The strategy worked, allowing an incompetent, USA-hating pettifogger to assume the presidency, and then get re-elected in 2012.

 

Anyone with a clear vantage point could not deny that yahoo played a consequential, vital part in the 2008 US Presidential Election, and a supporting role in the 2012 election.

 

Since then, yahoo’s leftist smear tactics, and manufactured indoctrination fake news platform has waned, but not by its own putrid acts of mendacious pseudo-journalism practices that spurned appropriate and carefully vetted investigative inquiry.

 

Yahoo’s meteoric fall has come because of the response of organized efforts to expose it for its clear leftist agenda reporting, as well as its tabloid-centered content stream.

 

Since 2008, yahoo has declined in market appraisal from $44.6 billion, to around $5 billion.

 

Yet, despite its market cap collapse, yahoo still retains the “bones” to cause issue and difficulty to anyone, regardless of status or position.

 

The FBI citing a yahoo article to substantiate a warrant request is appalling, and highlights yahoo’s substantial influence in the political arena, as well as their prominence to collude with corrupt officials against the US Citizens’ best interests.

 

I have fought a long-standing war against yahoo, and their lewd and indecent pseudo-journalism.

 

I will not put an end to this conflict until yahoo is destroyed and their obscene legacy is removed from our consciousness.

 

Even in their economically disastrous condition, yahoo is a dangerous force.  Their abhorrence for our culture and our country makes them enemies of our Republic.

 

Yet, my indignation is much lower for yahoo, in contrast to my rage toward the FBI.

 

The secret societies within the FBI, and perhaps in other branches of our government, are the enforcers of yahoo’s disgusting program of leftist hate.  They form the conduit through which such cultural antipathy can inflict deadly force upon the well-being of our liberty.

 

Not only did the FBI fail to execute their lawful obligations, they conspired with yahoo to circumvent our judicial practice and—even more reprehensible—influence our presidential election.

 

The FBI dared to suppose they are the choosers of our presidents.  Worse yet, they didn’t even have the aptitude, or the enterprise, to do their own damn research.

 

Since we have learned that the FBI is the “hired gun” of the DNC—ultimately the leftist-faction—where does yahoo fit into the revolting scheme?

 

Evidently, they are the investigator and the source of a soiled and foul network of “anonymous sources” and accomplices whose singular objective is to undermine and remove the rightfully sitting president elected by the US Voters.

 

For this reason, I remain vigilant against yahoo and its vast organization of leftist-agenda-spewing, USA-hating media, political, and police dynamisms.

 

As for the FBI, I question their need anymore.

 

Perhaps it’s best to reconstitute its guts and hierarchy, and create a new law-enforcement agency that would not be so radically politicized.

 

If we fail to do something about the FBI corruption that is staring us in the face, we will never be certain if we have removed the cancerous tissue that has inflicted and metastasized all across its body.

 

Time is of the essence.

 

Or else, one day soon, a more corrupt system of law-enforcement may approach yahoo’s bankrupt headquarters and appeal to Verizon’s Corporate investors, and just pin badges on them.

 

http://baltazarbolado.com

 

On twitter: https://twitter.com/baltazar_bolado

 

Author of: http://baltazarbolado.com/book/publius-liberatas-aut-mors/

http://baltazarbolado.com/book/paint-black/

Yellow Journalism—Yahoo’s Rapid Decline and Their Gutter Legacy was originally seen on baltazarbolado.com

Source: http://www.baltazarbolado.com/yellow-journalism-yahoos-rapid-decline-and-their-gutter-legacy/



source https://baltazarbolado1.wordpress.com/2018/02/03/yellow-journalism-yahoos-rapid-decline-and-their-gutter-legacy/